Data

Intensity of multidimensional poverty

National, Harmonized over time
See all data and research on:

What you should know about this indicator

  • Being MPI poor means that a person is deprived in a third or more of ten indicators, grouped into three dimensions: health (using two indicators: nutrition, child mortality), education (using two indicators: years of schooling, school attendance) and living standards (using five indicators: cooking fuel, sanitation, drinking water, electricity, housing, assets).
  • Households are assessed as being deprived in a given indicator if they do not meet a certain threshold for that indicator. For instance, a household is deprived in the Years of schooling indicator if no household member has completed six years of schooling. A person is considered deprived in the Cooking fuel indicator if they cook using solid fuel, such as dung, agricultural crops, wood, charcoal, or coal. The thresholds for each indicator are published by OPHI in their methodological notes.
  • The individual indicators are not weighted equally: When adding up the number of indicators in which a person is deprived, some count for more than others. Health and education indicators are given a weight of 1/6, while the indicators within the living standards dimension are given a weight of 1/18. This means that the three dimensions – health, education and living standards – have an equal weight in the total of one-third each.
  • If the household survey data being used is missing any of the 10 indicators, that indicator is dropped from the calculation. The weights are then adjusted so that each dimension continues to be given a weight of one-third. MPI poverty estimates are only calculated if at least one indicator in health and education dimensions is available, and if up to four indicators in the living standards dimension are available.
  • The intensity of multidimensional poverty is calculated as the average share of indicators in which those counted as MPI poor are deprived (using the same weights to calculate the average). This is an important complementary measure to the share of the population who are MPI poor (the incidence of MPI poverty).
  • An example given by the researchers who calculate the MPI data serves to illustrate this well: "Imagine two countries: in both, 30% of people are poor (incidence). Judged by this piece of information, these two countries are equally poor. However, imagine that in one of the two countries poor people are deprived —on average— in one-third of the dimensions, whereas in the other country, the poor are deprived —on average— in two-thirds. By combining the two pieces of information -the intensity of deprivations and the proportion of poor people- we know that these two countries are not equally poor, but rather that the second is poorer than the first because the intensity of poverty is higher."
  • This variable is a harmonized over time (HOT) estimate. This harmonization seeks to make two or more MPI estimations comparable by aligning the indicator definitions in each survey. Look for the current margin estimate (CME) to see the most recent survey data.

The global MPI is a measure of acute poverty covering over 100 countries in the developing regions of the world. This measure is based on the dual-cutoff counting approach to poverty developed by Alkire and Foster (2011). The global MPI was developed in 2010 by Alkire and Santos (2014, 2010) in collaboration with the UNDP’s Human Development Report Office (HDRO). Since its inception, the global MPI has used information from 10 indicators, which are grouped into three equally weighted dimensions: health, education, and living standards. These dimensions are the same as those used in the UNDP’s Human Development Index.

In 2018, the first major revision of the global MPI was undertaken, considering improvements in survey microdata and better align to the 2030 development agenda insofar as possible (Alkire and Jahan, 2018; OPHI, 2018). The revision consisted of adjustments in the definition of five out of the ten indicators, namely child mortality, nutrition, years of schooling, housing and assets. Alkire, Kanagaratnam, Nogales and Suppa (2022) provide a comprehensive analysis of the consequences of the 2018 revision. The normative and empirical decisions that underlie the revision of the global MPI, and adjustments related to the child mortality, nutrition, years of schooling and housing indicators are discussed in Alkire and Kanagaratnam (2021). The revision of assets indicator is detailed in Vollmer and Alkire (2022).

The global MPI begins by establishing a deprivation profile for each person, showing which of the 10 indicators they are deprived in. Each person is identified as deprived or non-deprived in each indicator based on a deprivation cutoff. In the case of health and education, each household member may be identified as deprived or not deprived according to available information for other household members. For example, if any household member for whom data exist is undernourished, each person in that household is considered deprived in nutrition. Taking this approach – which was required by the data – does not reveal intrahousehold disparities, but is intuitive and assumes shared positive (or negative) effects of achieving (or not achieving) certain outcomes. Next, looking across indicators, each person’s deprivation score is constructed by adding up the weights of the indicators in which they are deprived. The indicators use a nested weight structure: equal weights across dimensions and an equal weight for each indicator within a dimension. The normalised indicator weight structure of the global MPI means that the living standard indicators receive lower weight than health and education related indicators because from a policy perspective, each of the three dimensions is of roughly equal normative importance.

In the global MPI, a person is identified as multidimensionally poor or MPI poor if they are deprived in at least one-third of the weighted MPI indicators. In other words, a person is MPI poor if the person’s deprivation score is equal to or higher than the poverty cutoff of 33.33 percent. After the poverty identification step, we aggregate across individuals to obtain the incidence of poverty or headcount ratio (H) which represents the percentage of poor people in the population. We then compute the intensity of poverty (A), representing the average percentage of weighted deprivations experienced by the poor. We then compute the adjusted poverty headcount ratio (M0) or MPI by combining H and A in a multiplicative form (MPI = H x A).

Both the incidence and the intensity of these deprivations are highly relevant pieces of information for poverty measurement. The incidence of poverty is intuitive and understandable by anyone. People always want to know how many poor people there are in a society as a proportion of the whole population. Media tend to pick up on the incidence of poverty easily. Yet, the proportion of poor people as the headline figure is not enough (Alkire, Oldiges and Kanagaratnam, 2021).

A headcount ratio is also estimated using two other poverty cutoffs. The global MPI identifies individuals as vulnerable to poverty if they are close to the one-third threshold, that is, if they are deprived in 20 to 33.32 percent of weighted indicators. The tables also apply a higher poverty cutoff to identify those in severe poverty, meaning those deprived in 50 percent or more of the dimensions.

The AF methodology has a property that makes the global MPI even more useful—dimensional breakdown. This property makes it possible to consistently compute the percentage of the population who are multidimensionally poor and simultaneously deprived in each indicator. This is known as the censored headcount ratio of an indicator. The weighted sum of censored headcount ratios of all MPI indicators is equal to the MPI value.

The censored headcount ratio shows the extent of deprivations among the poor but does not reflect the weights or relative values of the indicators. Two indicators may have the same censored headcount ratios but different contributions to overall poverty, because the contribution depends both on the censored headcount ratio and on the weight assigned to each indicator. As such, a complementary analysis to the censored headcount ratio is the percentage contribution of each indicator to overall multidimensional poverty.

Intensity of multidimensional poverty
National, Harmonized over time
Multidimensional poverty is defined as being deprived in a range of health, education and living standards indicators. The intensity is the share of indicators in which the multidimensionally poor are deprived on average.
Source
Alkire, Kanagaratnam and Suppa (2024) - The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2024 – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Last updated
October 28, 2024
Next expected update
October 2025
Date range
2001–2023
Unit
%

Sources and processing

This data is based on the following sources

The global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) is an international measure of acute multidimensional poverty covering over 100 developing countries. It complements traditional monetary poverty measures by capturing the acute deprivations in health, education, and living standards that a person faces simultaneously.

The MPI assesses poverty at the individual level. If a person is deprived in a third or more of ten (weighted) indicators, the global MPI identifies them as ‘MPI poor’. The extent – or intensity – of their poverty is also measured through the percentage of deprivations they are experiencing.

The global MPI shows who is poor and how they are poor and can be used to create a comprehensive picture of people living in poverty. It permits comparisons both across countries and world regions, and within countries by ethnic group, urban/rural area, subnational region, and age group, as well as other key household and community characteristics. For each group and for countries as a whole, the composition of MPI by each of the ten indicators shows how people are poor.

This makes the MPI and its linked information platform invaluable as an analytical tool to identify the most vulnerable people – the poorest among the poor, revealing poverty patterns within countries and over time, enabling policy makers to target resources and design policies more effectively.

The global MPI was developed by OPHI with the UN Development Programme (UNDP) for inclusion in UNDP’s flagship Human Development Report in 2010. It has been published annually by OPHI and in the HDRs ever since.

Retrieved on
October 28, 2024
Citation
This is the citation of the original data obtained from the source, prior to any processing or adaptation by Our World in Data. To cite data downloaded from this page, please use the suggested citation given in Reuse This Work below.
  • Alkire, S., Kanagaratnam, U., and Suppa, N. (2024). The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2024. Country Results and Methodological Note. OPHI MPI Methodological Note 58, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford.
  • Alkire, S., Kanagaratnam, U., and Suppa, N. (2024). The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2024. Disaggregation Results and Methodological Note. OPHI MPI Methodological Note 59, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford.

How we process data at Our World in Data

All data and visualizations on Our World in Data rely on data sourced from one or several original data providers. Preparing this original data involves several processing steps. Depending on the data, this can include standardizing country names and world region definitions, converting units, calculating derived indicators such as per capita measures, as well as adding or adapting metadata such as the name or the description given to an indicator.

At the link below you can find a detailed description of the structure of our data pipeline, including links to all the code used to prepare data across Our World in Data.

Read about our data pipeline

Reuse this work

  • All data produced by third-party providers and made available by Our World in Data are subject to the license terms from the original providers. Our work would not be possible without the data providers we rely on, so we ask you to always cite them appropriately (see below). This is crucial to allow data providers to continue doing their work, enhancing, maintaining and updating valuable data.
  • All data, visualizations, and code produced by Our World in Data are completely open access under the Creative Commons BY license. You have the permission to use, distribute, and reproduce these in any medium, provided the source and authors are credited.

Citations

How to cite this page

To cite this page overall, including any descriptions, FAQs or explanations of the data authored by Our World in Data, please use the following citation:

“Data Page: Intensity of multidimensional poverty”, part of the following publication: Joe Hasell, Max Roser, Esteban Ortiz-Ospina and Pablo Arriagada (2022) - “Poverty”. Data adapted from Alkire, Kanagaratnam and Suppa. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/intensity-of-multidimensional-poverty-hot [online resource]
How to cite this data

In-line citationIf you have limited space (e.g. in data visualizations), you can use this abbreviated in-line citation:

Alkire, Kanagaratnam and Suppa (2024) - The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2024 – with minor processing by Our World in Data

Full citation

Alkire, Kanagaratnam and Suppa (2024) - The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2024 – with minor processing by Our World in Data. “Intensity of multidimensional poverty – National, Harmonized over time” [dataset]. Alkire, Kanagaratnam and Suppa, “Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2024” [original data]. Retrieved November 14, 2024 from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/intensity-of-multidimensional-poverty-hot