Annual private investment in artificial intelligence
What you should know about this indicator
- The dataset only covers private-market investment flows, such as venture capital. It excludes non-equity financing, such as debt and grants, and omits publicly traded companies, including major Big Tech firms (e.g., Amazon, Microsoft, Meta). As a result, significant investments from public companies, corporate R&D, government funding, and broader infrastructure costs (like data centers and hardware) are not captured, limiting the dataset’s coverage of global AI investments.
- Companies are classified as AI-related based on keyword and industry tags, potentially including firms not traditionally seen as AI-focused while missing others due to definitional differences.
- Many investment values are undisclosed, so the source relies on median values from similar transactions, introducing some uncertainty. Additionally, investment origin is attributed to company headquarters, which may overlook cross-border structures or varied investor origins.
- One-time events like large acquisitions can skew yearly figures, and macroeconomic conditions (e.g., interest rates, market sentiment) may impact trends independently of AI-related dynamics.
- The dataset’s "World" aggregate reflects the total investment represented but does not encompass global AI efforts comprehensively, especially in countries not included in the data.
- The dataset likely underestimates the total global AI investment, as it only captures certain types of private equity transactions, excluding other significant channels and categories of AI-related spending.
Sources and processing
This data is based on the following sources
How we process data at Our World in Data
All data and visualizations on Our World in Data rely on data sourced from one or several original data providers. Preparing this original data involves several processing steps. Depending on the data, this can include standardizing country names and world region definitions, converting units, calculating derived indicators such as per capita measures, as well as adding or adapting metadata such as the name or the description given to an indicator.
At the link below you can find a detailed description of the structure of our data pipeline, including links to all the code used to prepare data across Our World in Data.
Notes on our processing step for this indicator
- Reporting a time series of AI investments in nominal prices (i.e., without adjusting for inflation) means it makes little sense to compare observations across time; it is therefore not very useful. To make comparisons across time possible, one has to take into account that prices change (e.g., there is inflation).
- It is not obvious how to adjust this time series for inflation, and we debated it at some length within our team.
- It would be straightforward to adjust the time series for price changes if we knew the prices of the specific goods and services that these investments purchased. This would make it possible to calculate a volume measure of AI investments, and it would tell us how much these investments bought. But such a metric is not available. While a comprehensive price index is not available, we know that the cost for some crucial AI technology has fallen rapidly in price.
- In the absence of a comprehensive price index that captures the price of AI-specific goods and services, one has to rely on one of the available metrics for the price of a bundle of goods and services. In the end we decided to use the US Consumer Price Index (CPI).
- The US CPI does not provide us with a volume measure of AI goods and services, but it does capture the opportunity costs of these investments. The inflation adjustment of this time series of AI investments therefore lets us understand the size of these investments relative to whatever else these sums of money could have purchased.
Reuse this work
- All data produced by third-party providers and made available by Our World in Data are subject to the license terms from the original providers. Our work would not be possible without the data providers we rely on, so we ask you to always cite them appropriately (see below). This is crucial to allow data providers to continue doing their work, enhancing, maintaining and updating valuable data.
- All data, visualizations, and code produced by Our World in Data are completely open access under the Creative Commons BY license. You have the permission to use, distribute, and reproduce these in any medium, provided the source and authors are credited.
Citations
How to cite this page
To cite this page overall, including any descriptions, FAQs or explanations of the data authored by Our World in Data, please use the following citation:
“Data Page: Annual private investment in artificial intelligence”, part of the following publication: Charlie Giattino, Edouard Mathieu, Veronika Samborska and Max Roser (2023) - “Artificial Intelligence”. Data adapted from Center for Security and Emerging Technology, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/private-investment-in-artificial-intelligence-cset [online resource]
How to cite this data
In-line citationIf you have limited space (e.g. in data visualizations), you can use this abbreviated in-line citation:
Center for Security and Emerging Technology (2024); U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024) – processed by Our World in Data
Full citation
Center for Security and Emerging Technology (2024); U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024) – processed by Our World in Data. “Annual private investment in artificial intelligence” [dataset]. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, “Country Activity Tracker: Artificial Intelligence”; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “US consumer prices” [original data]. Retrieved November 24, 2024 from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/private-investment-in-artificial-intelligence-cset