Data InsightsThe new Living Planet Index reports a 73% average decline in studied wildlife populations

The new Living Planet Index reports a 73% average decline in studied wildlife populations

Line chart of average wildlife population abundance from 1970 to 2022 where the Living Planet Index falls steadily from a baseline of 1 to about 0.27, representing a 73% average decline; an inset bar shows 43% of populations increased, 7% were stable, and 50% declined. The index covers 35,803 populations across 5,790 species relative to the year 1970. Source: WWF and Zoological Society of London (2026). License: CC BY.

The new Living Planet Index report has just been published. It estimates an average decline of 73% in studied wildlife populations since 1970. You can see this in the chart.

Every two years, it hits the headlines, and I always have mixed feelings about it.

I love that biodiversity loss gets its rare spot in the limelight. It’s a problem that I think doesn’t get enough attention. The trouble is that journalists often report it incorrectly: either as the number of animals or wildlife lost, the number of species in decline, or the number that have gone extinct.

But it tells us none of that.

It examines changes across nearly 36,000 animal populations and reports the average change. This gets even more complicated because it’s based on a geometric mean, and populations get weighted differently in the final index.

When we look a bit deeper, we see that not all populations are doing poorly. As shown in the chart, around half have declined, while the other half have either increased in abundance or remained stable.

As I explained in a previous article, being able to identify which of these populations is doing particularly badly is crucial if we’re to focus our conservation efforts on where they’re needed most.

Read my explainer on what the Living Planet Index captures, and what’s different in this report from previous ones