Look at reported maternal mortality rates in the United States, and you’ll see an alarming rise since the early 2000s.

This rise has been widely covered in the media. See a 2023 article on Scientific American: “Why Maternal Mortality Rates Are Getting Worse across the U.S.” Or a report on National Public Radio (NPR): “The number of people dying in the U.S. from pregnancy-related causes has more than doubled in the last 20 years.” It has, understandably, been a big concern among the public.

But researchers have shown that this rise does not represent an actual increase in the number of women dying in childbirth. Rather, it is the result of a change in measurement that was gradually introduced in the US between 2003 and 2017.

This change wasn’t adopted at a national level in a single moment; that would have led to a single step-wise change in mortality rates. Instead, the measurement change was adopted state by state, which led to a gradual rise over 14 years.

This measurement change has helped to identify more deaths that meet the criteria for maternal deaths, but has also led to some misclassification.

The process of determining the cause of death can be complicated, and in many countries, national statistics from death certificates tend to miss some maternal deaths. To tackle this, some countries have used additional systems to identify maternal deaths that would otherwise be unreported.

In this article, I explain how a change in measurement in the United States led to an apparent rising trend in maternal deaths.

The recent rise in reported US maternal mortality looks alarming

Maternal mortality refers to the death of mothers from pregnancy, childbirth, abortion, or related causes.

The chart below shows trends in reported maternal mortality rates between different countries. Rates are measured as the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 women in the population. It shows the statistics as reported to the World Health Organization.¹

You can see that the maternal mortality rate has fallen across all of these countries since 1950.

But in the last two decades, the rate appears to have risen steeply in the United States. Between 2003 and 2017, it has more than doubled, from 0.4 to 0.8 deaths per 100,000 women.

In other countries such as France, Canada, and the United Kingdom the rates were stable or slightly falling.

Download image

Maternal deaths had previously been underestimated

According to the International Classification of Diseases, which is the international system to classify causes of death, a maternal death is counted if pregnancy or related causes are listed as the “underlying cause of death” on a death certificate.

This cause of death is filled into the field of the death certificate by doctors and nurses, based on the circumstances of death and medical records, according to their medical knowledge. The cause of death is then reported in the country’s vital registry.

You can read more about how causes of death are determined in my article:

How are causes of death registered around the world?

In many countries, when people die, the cause of their death is officially registered in their country’s national system. How is this determined?

But research has found that data from death certificates often underestimates maternal deaths.²

One reason is that some maternal deaths are missed and attributed to other causes. This can happen because pregnancy can worsen pre-existing conditions, such as HIV/AIDS and cardiovascular diseases, and thereby indirectly lead to a woman’s death.³ In these cases, it can be difficult for doctors to make a judgment call on whether the woman would have died if she had not been pregnant.⁴

To complicate the situation further, sometimes medical records are lacking or inaccessible, and many deceased women don’t have linked hospital records or undergo an autopsy to confirm whether they were pregnant at the time of death.⁵

There can also be social, cultural, or legal issues around reporting whether women were pregnant when they died.

To address these problems, which can lead to the underestimation of maternal deaths, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) expanded its definition of maternal deaths and recommended that countries collect additional data on whether deceased women had been pregnant before their death.

In the ninth edition, known as ICD-9 (published in 1979), the definition of maternal mortality was very narrow: it focused only on deaths during childbirth or the postpartum period, and considered any causes related to, or aggravated by, the pregnancy or its management.

The updated ICD-10 (published in 1994) expanded the definition. It considered all those deaths as maternal which happened during pregnancy, childbirth, or within 42 days of the end of pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, but not from accidental or incidental causes.⁶

The ICD-10 also recommended that a “pregnancy checkbox” be included in national death certificates, which would help flag these deaths for further investigation to understand if they were caused by pregnancy.

The checkbox asked if the deceased woman was pregnant or had been recently pregnant. You can see an example below, which is used in death certificates in the United States.

This checkbox was introduced to reduce underestimation and to capture maternal mortality more accurately.

Download image

As the checkbox was gradually implemented in the United States, more maternal deaths were reported

To follow the ICD-10 definition and make sure that maternal deaths weren’t going uncounted, the United States added the “pregnancy checkbox” to death certificates, starting in 2003.

The US used an automated system to code deaths as maternal deaths if the checkbox was ticked for women between the ages of 10 and 54, for deaths caused by medical conditions, regardless of other information on the death certificate.⁸

In 2003, four states had implemented the pregnancy checkbox — Idaho, Maryland, Montana, and New York state.⁹

In the following years, more and more states added the checkbox. It wasn’t until 2017 that every state included it on death certificates. You can see this in the chart below.

As more and more states included the pregnancy checkbox, more deaths were identified as related to pregnancy, and the reported maternal mortality rate increased.¹⁰

Download image

To understand the impact of the measurement change, we can also examine what happened to maternal mortality within states.

This is shown in the chart below, which plots the average maternal mortality ratio before and after the change.

The chart comes from reports from the National Center for Health Statistics and the National Vital Statistics System, which is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

You can see that once the checkbox was implemented, the reported maternal mortality ratio suddenly increased — on average, it doubled from 10 to 20 deaths per 100,000 births — and then remained stable.¹¹

Download image

The researchers also estimated what the maternal mortality ratio from 2003 to 2017 would have looked like under two hypothetical scenarios: (a) if all states adopted the checkbox simultaneously, or (b) if none of them did.

In both scenarios, they estimate that there would have been no change in maternal mortality ratios between 2003 and 2017.

In other words, the rise in maternal mortality is largely explained by the staggered adoption of the checkbox.¹³ The researchers also noted that the impact of the change in measurement was greatest among older women and non-Hispanic black women.¹⁴

The checkbox increased the ability to detect pregnancy-related deaths that would have been missed otherwise, but in some cases, it also resulted in overcounting deaths from other causes.

In a quality assurance study of four US states, researchers found that around 21% of death certificates with the checkbox ticked were confirmed to be false positives — data from other health systems confirmed they had not been pregnant, and this was especially the case in girls aged under 15 and women aged over 45.¹⁵ One reason for these false positives is that the box was ticked accidentally in some cases.¹⁶

To reduce these false positives, another change in measurement has been made in US statistics: from 2018 onwards, the checkbox is disregarded for women and girls aged under 10 or over 45.¹⁷

Researchers also recommended further quality assurance processes — such as conducting follow-ups to verify ticked checkboxes and improving training for death certifiers — to be conducted in other states in the US before sending data to the vital registry, to improve the accuracy of national data on maternal deaths.¹⁸

Maternal mortality is underreported in national statistics in many countries

While the United States has used the checkbox to automatically code deaths as maternal if it is ticked¹⁹, this practice is not followed in several other countries.²⁰

There is strong evidence that maternal mortality, as defined in the ICD, is underreported in national statistics in many countries.²¹

One reason is that some countries do not use data from the checkbox to identify potential maternal deaths, or do not routinely conduct additional investigations to identify unreported maternal deaths.²⁰

Some countries have implemented systems separate from their vital registries to investigate potential maternal deaths further.²² These systems include “enhanced surveillance”, which involves an additional system for more detailed monitoring, and “confidential inquiries”, which are private investigations into individual cases.

These investigations have been conducted infrequently, and the maternal deaths identified through these systems are not necessarily counted in vital registries for national statistics and given to the WHO.²³

Research finds that the number of maternal deaths from vital registries tend to be lower than equivalent definitions from these other surveillance systems.²⁴

In low- and middle-income countries — where death certificates and vital registries are often lacking — other sources of data are used to determine maternal deaths, including hospital records, and verbal autopsies.

Maternal mortality data from these sources can also include women who have died from incidental or accidental causes of death that are unrelated to their pregnancy, because data to identify the specific causes of death may be lacking.²⁵

International statistics on maternal mortality are adjusted for underreporting, but uncertainties remain

To address this problem — of underreported maternal deaths in vital registries — the United Nations Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-agency Group (MMEIG) uses other data sources and expert knowledge to adjust for underreporting.

In countries that lack other surveillance systems for maternal deaths, the number of maternal deaths are adjusted upwards.

In countries that have enhanced surveillance data, different adjustment factors are used to adjust for incompleteness and misclassification.²⁶

Unfortunately, this adjustment can be imprecise because many countries lack comprehensive data on causes of death, or have not conducted national investigations into unreported maternal deaths, which could be used to understand the degree of underreporting in each country and improve adjustment factors.²⁷

Conclusion

To prevent avoidable maternal deaths, it’s crucial to have accurate data on deaths caused by pregnancy and related causes.

Unfortunately, maternal deaths are often underreported in official statistics due to a range of reasons, such as missing medical records and poor training of death certifiers.

To help identify missed deaths, the United States introduced a “pregnancy checkbox” on death certificates, and deaths of women with this box ticked would be coded as maternal deaths in most age groups.

While this helped identify maternal deaths that would have been missed, it also led to some misclassification and false positives from women who had not been pregnant or had died from other incidental causes.

Because of this, the US changed its coding system in 2018 to disregard the checkbox for deaths of patients under 10 or over 45 years old.

Researchers have also recommended that additional quality-assurance measures are used to verify potential maternal deaths before they are compiled in US national statistics.

In other high-income countries, there is strong evidence that maternal mortality is underreported in national statistics.

Some countries rely on additional systems to uncover unreported maternal deaths, but these tend to be conducted infrequently and are not necessarily considered in national statistics.

In contrast, data from low- and middle-income countries — which tend to lack death certificates, hospital records, and vital registries — are less precise.

International organizations try to adjust for these problems of underreporting and misclassification, but without better surveillance in each country, the adjustments can be imprecise.

By improving data collection and surveillance of maternal deaths further, the world can have a better understanding of where and why mothers are dying, mobilize resources and policies to save lives, and reduce maternal mortality further.

Saloni Dattani (2024) - “The rise in reported maternal mortality rates in the US is largely due to a change in measurement” Published online at OurWorldinData.org. Retrieved from: 'https://ourworldindata.org/rise-us-maternal-mortality-rates-measurement' [Online Resource]

@article{owid-rise-us-maternal-mortality-rates-measurement,
    author = {Saloni Dattani},
    title = {The rise in reported maternal mortality rates in the US is largely due to a change in measurement},
    journal = {Our World in Data},
    year = {2024},
    note = {https://ourworldindata.org/rise-us-maternal-mortality-rates-measurement}
}

Reuse this work freely

All visualizations, data, and code produced by Our World in Data are completely open access under the Creative Commons BY license. You have the permission to use, distribute, and reproduce these in any medium, provided the source and authors are credited.

The data produced by third parties and made available by Our World in Data is subject to the license terms from the original third-party authors. We will always indicate the original source of the data in our documentation, so you should always check the license of any such third-party data before use and redistribution.

All of our charts can be embedded in any site.